
A QA tester checks software before customers do: they read what a feature is supposed to do, test it against those requirements, try to break it in ways real users will, report bugs with clear steps to reproduce them, and confirm fixes before release. Your product needs one when customers start finding bugs faster than your team does.
Many SaaS founders put testing off because developers can test their own code. They can, up to a point. Developers test the path they built. Testers test the paths nobody planned for, and that is where most production bugs live.
Below we cover what a QA tester does day to day, the difference between manual and automated testing, the two numbers that tell you it is time to hire, and how to hire and run the role remotely.
A QA tester is a software professional who verifies that a product works as intended before it reaches customers. The job combines reading requirements, designing tests, running them, documenting bugs and confirming fixes.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics groups the role with software developers in its Occupational Outlook Handbook and describes the work as developing and running tests to find software problems and their causes (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025). In a small company, that translates into a person whose whole day is finding what is broken before a customer does.
A good tester is not the person who clicks around until something fails. A good tester reads the ticket, writes down what correct behavior looks like, tests the edges, and writes a bug report a developer can act on without a follow up question.
A QA tester's day follows the release cycle: new features coming in, fixes going back out, and a regression check before anything ships.
Step six is where a tester pays off fastest in a SaaS company. Support teams often forward vague customer complaints. A tester who reproduces the bug and writes a clean ticket can save a developer an afternoon. Our guide on scaling SaaS customer support with a remote L1 team covers the support side of that handoff.
Manual testing means a person runs the tests and judges the result. Automated testing means code runs predefined checks on every build. Most small teams need manual testing first, then automate the checks that repeat on every release.
| Factor | Manual tester | Automation tester | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| New features changing every week | Adapts immediately | Scripts break and need rewriting | Manual |
| Regression checks on stable features | Slow and repetitive | Fast and repeatable on every build | Automation |
| Usability and confusing flows | Notices what feels wrong | Checks only what it was told to check | Manual |
| Frequent releases | Becomes a bottleneck at high volume | Keeps pace with daily releases | Automation |
| Cost and ramp time | Lower, productive within weeks | Higher, needs coding skills and setup | Manual |
A practical path for a small product team: hire a manual tester who can document test cases well, then add automation for the regression suite once the product stops changing shape every week. Some testers do both, and those profiles cost more.
Your product needs a dedicated QA tester when two numbers move in the wrong direction at the same time: escaped bugs go up and release frequency goes down. Either one alone can have other causes. Both together usually mean testing has become nobody's job.
Escaped bugs are bugs found by customers after a release. Count them per release from your support tickets. If the count rises for several releases in a row, the team is shipping faster than it is checking.
Release frequency is how often you ship to production. If releases are slipping because developers spend days clicking through old features before every deploy, you are paying developer rates for regression testing.
Two or more of those signals mean the testing work already exists in your company. It is being done badly, late, or by your most expensive people.
In the United States, the median annual wage for software QA analysts and testers was 102,610 USD in May 2024, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2025). Add payroll taxes, benefits and equipment, and the full cost of a local hire sits well above that figure.
Seniority and specialty move the number. Automation skills, performance testing and security testing all cost more than manual functional testing. Contractors and agencies bill by the hour, which works for a launch but gets expensive as an ongoing seat.
A full time remote tester in Latin America usually costs a fraction of a United States salary for comparable experience, and works overlapping hours with your developers. Exact cost depends on manual versus automation skills and years of experience, so it is worth scoping the role before comparing quotes.
Hire a remote QA tester the way you would hire any tester: give them a real build, a real ticket and an hour, and read the bug reports they produce. Then run the role with written test cases, a shared bug tracker and a clear release checklist.
Hiring a tester should follow the same logic the job itself follows. Patrick McCuller frames technical hiring around taking an engineering approach, relying on evidence, and treating candidates as customers (McCuller, 2013). A scored build with known bugs produces that evidence; a conversation about testing philosophy does not. Scott Wintrip calls the same step an experiential interview, one that gives proof a candidate either fits the work or does not (Wintrip, 2017).
Time zone overlap matters for testing because bugs found at 4pm need a developer who is still online. Our guide on Latin America time zones against United States business hours shows the overlap by country.
Remote Latinos places vetted technical professionals from Latin America, including testers. You can hire a vetted remote QA tester, review the roles most commonly staffed remotely, or read our guide on how to hire remote developers if you are building the wider engineering team.
A QA tester finds what is broken before your customers do: writing test cases, running them, reporting bugs clearly and confirming fixes before release. Start with manual testing, automate the regression checks that repeat, and hire when escaped bugs rise while releases slow down.
Judge candidates by the bug reports they write, not by the tools on their résumé. Give the role clear ownership and a weekly number to watch.
You can also read:
See how other product teams added remote technical staff in the client testimonials, or book a call to scope a QA role.
A QA tester verifies that software works as intended before release. They write test cases from requirements, test new features, report bugs with steps to reproduce them, retest fixes, and run regression checks so new code does not break existing features.
A manual QA tester runs tests by hand, using the product the way a customer would. They follow written test cases, try edge cases nobody planned for, judge whether behavior makes sense, and document every bug clearly enough for a developer to fix it without asking questions.
A software QA tester checks applications against their requirements before customers use them. The work includes test planning, functional testing, regression testing, bug reporting and fix verification, usually inside a staging environment and a shared bug tracker.
A QA test engineer usually writes automated tests in code, builds the test framework, and connects it to the release pipeline so checks run on every build. The title often signals automation skills on top of the manual testing a QA tester does.
McCuller, P. (2013). How to recruit and hire great software engineers: Building a crack development team. Apress.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2025). Software developers, QA analysts, and testers. Occupational Outlook Handbook.
Wintrip, S. (2017). High velocity hiring: How to hire top talent in an instant. McGraw-Hill Education.


